Mr. Jensen's U.S. History Website
  • U.S. History Blog
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2026 - May 2027)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2025 - May 2026)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2024 - May 2025)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2023 - May 2024)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2022 - May 2023)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2021 - May 2022)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2020 - May 2021)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2019 - May 2020)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2018 - May 2019)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2017 - May 2018)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2016 - May 2017)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2015 - May 2016)
    • U.S. History Blog (May, 2014 - May, 2015)
  • About

General Motors: 1948 - 1956

3/18/2017

0 Comments

 
                    Source: David Halberstam. The Fifties (1997)
Picture
     By the early 1900's, the American Worker also became the American Consumer. The "Oil Man", unlike his predecessor, the "Coal Man", was the beneficiary of his own labor. With the advent of mass production and lowered prices, the working man of the early-1900's could afford what was produced. The "Oil Century" began in earnest in 1949, and the U.S., with its accessible and inexpensive domestic oil sources, was the first nation to truly cross the threshhold.
     During WW II vast systems networks were created for oil production, transportation, and refineries, and all were in place operating at full capacity in 1949. And the price for oil remained low, and oil drove the U.S. economy to great heights in all sectors. From 1949 to 1972, U.S. consumption of oil went from 5.8 million barrels/day to 16.4 million. In 1949, coal represented 2/3's of the world's energy, but by 1972, it was oil at 2/3's. World War II had diverted the American economy away from the consumer to the military, but after the war, the consumer was not to be denied.

Picture
      In the years immediately after WW II, a great seller's market existed, and there was also a desperate hunger by consumers to buy things after the Great Depression and WW II. A major symbol of U.S. economic might was General Motors (GM), a company so powerful the word corporation really wasn't all that accurate a description. GM was the largest/richest corporation in the world by far: GM was the first corporation to gross $1B. Ford, by comparison, was near bankruptcy after WW II due to the erratic-and-paranoid behavior of Henry Ford. GM actually helped Ford by basically giving top management executives to Henry Ford II so GM wouldn't have to deal with anti-monopoly charges from the federal government.
     During the 1950s GM made more cars than its competitors combined. The only thing that could possibly throw a monkey wrench into GM's colossal success was the possibility of labor unrest. During 1945-46 a bitter strike over low wages at GM lasted over 100 days. GM wanted to teach the United Auto Workers (UAW) a lesson, and held firm with only 0.01/hour separating the two sides. Charles Wilson, the CEO of GM, saw the fantastic future in terms of absolutely massive profits, and was also sympathetic to the workers.

Picture
     In 1948, Wilson agreed to an historic contract, knowing that virtually unlimited sales and profits were in the offing. Wilson offered an acceptable wage increase plus a cost-of-living index, which matched wages to inflation. The UAW was made, in effect, a junior partner of GM, since wages were tied to productivity . . . for a generation, GM had no labor unrest. Wilson also knew that he could pass the at least most of the burden of higher labor costs to the consumer.
     GM decided to manufacture big cars since they generated far more profits than smaller cars. Production costs stayed the same no matter the size of the car, so it was a no-brainer for GM to build big cars. GM had waited a long time for this "Market of Abundance", and GM wanted to take full advantage. Therefore, the yearly model change was crucial for GM, in that the goal was to make car owners restless with the cars they owned, and eager to purchase anothe GM vehicle.


Picture
      GM's categories were the core of its success, making car owners restless by appealing to their broader aspirations in life. Chevrolet was for the blue collar worker and young adults in their 20's.
Pontiac was for those that felt successful/confident and that wanted something sportier. Oldsmobile was for the white collar manager or bureaucrat, and Buick was for the elite of the professional class (e.g. doctor/lawyer). The Cadillac was for the top executive or owner of a factory. A Cadillac signaled that a person had joined the proprietorial class; a Cadillac cost around $5000 ($49,745 in 2015 dollars), but it held its value, especially if it was traded in after a year or two.

Picture
     This was the 2nd Stage of the Automobile Era, in which the car was not only for transportation, but also for status. A car was not a permanent possession, but an economic benchmark signaling rising status. After WW II, GM decided that Americans wanted the following: Most important was design/style, second was an automatic transmission, and third was high compression engines. GM put out models that encouraged dreams at a time when most Americans believed their future would be nothing but grand. GM led the charge in terms of making design more important than engineering, which created a vicious cycle in the automobile industry: worship of the new at the expense of the old, even if the old was better.
     GM, Ford, and Chrysler were forced to opt for less effecient/attractive cars just for the sake of exterior design changes. Among the consequences was that GM didn't extend its initial technological lead versus foreign competitors (e.g. the Volkswagen Beetle). GM fiddled with styles and design details, especially the "fins", which became the most famous-and-visual automobile detail of the era . . . the fins represented zero technological advance in GM's cars. A fin was "visible prestige", nothing more than an illusion of a more powerful car. That approach by GM, Ford, and Chrylser would come back and haunt the Big 3 in the 1970s during the Arab Oil Embargoes of 1973 and 1979. While GM was selling an incredible number of cars in the 1950s, the corporation, without knowing so, was speeding towards "Dynamic Obsolescence". 

Picture
     But in the 1950s, Bigger was Better, and Americans wanted bigger cars with every passing model year. High compression engines and higher octane gasoline was the key to producing those huge cars . . . those two developments took off in 1946. The major component of the high compression engine was confining the vapors of gas in the cylinders before exploding, driving back the pistons with greater force, but that would only be possible with higher octane gas. In 1947, high octane gas was developed separately from the non-responsive oil companies by a GM high compression engine specialist. The new V-8 high compression engine with high octane gasoline was first put in the 1949 Cadillac. While the GM engine specialist envisioned greaty efficiency, the GM execs envisioned bigger cars with more-and-more accessories, such as power brakes/steering and air conditioning.
     Dwight D. Eisenhower was the first Republican President in 20 years, and GM was no longer worried about being accused of monopolistic practices with more than 50% of the market share. The attitude of GM's execs was that if the federal government wanted to stop GM, they would have to find a way to stop GM. In 1953, GM had 45% of the industry's market share, and by 1956 it reached 51%, and that wasn't enough for the GM execs, whose goal was actually 75% of the total market of cars sold in the U.S. by 1958.

0 Comments

The 1950s: The Great Migration & the Mechanical Cotton Picker

3/4/2017

0 Comments

 
                   Source: David Halberstam. The Fifties (1997)
Picture
      The Great Migration of the 1950s of African-Americans moving north was a continuing evolution that went back decades (BTW, the media does a much better job covering revolution compared to evolution). The Great Migration that began before World War I ended a kind of racial American Colonialism: "Separate But Equal" was a brand of colonialism practiced on African-Americans by whites. 
     While African-Americans in the South were able to migrate, they did so at a terrible disadvantage in that they didn't have the level of education that would lead to an easier transition and a more prosperous life. When the supply if European immigrants drastically decreased during World War I, northern factory owners turned to African-Americans in the South. World War II caused the next giant surge in the Great Migration North, and the South desperately tried to hang on to their cheap African-American labor force.
     The Chicago Defender was founded in 1905, and the newspaper became the voice of African-Americans in the North and South. The publisher was Robert S. Abbott, who saw African-Americans in the South as being merely the possessions of the White Establishment. Abbott printed not only his rage, but the rage felt by African-Americans. By 1919, 2/3's of the Defender's readers lived in the South. The more whites tried to ban the Defender, the more legitimate the newspaper became in the eyes of African-Americans.

Picture
     Usually, a pioneer within an African-American family in the South went North to scout for work, and to at least have a place to live waiting for the rest of the family when they migrated North. The greatest reason for the accelerated surge in the Great Migration after WW II was due to technology - the mechanical cotton picker. Once the mechanical cotton picker was in the fields, white Southerners couldn't wait to see African-Americans go North, and in most areas of the South, it was actually encouraged. 
   The mechanical cotton picker changed the landscape in the U.S., but historically the invention hasn't really registered compared to other developments such as the television. The inventor of record was John Daniel Rust, who was among the countless number of Southerners over the previous decades that had tried to create a machine that separated the cotton seed from the boll without destroying the cotton.
     Rust always had an inventive mind, and the mechanical cotton picker became his obsession. Many before had figured out how to get the cotton out of the boll with spinning spindles, but then the problem was how to get the cotton off the spindles. The cotton seemed to obey its own physical laws, and the machines that Rust (and others) created made an absolute mess of the cotton. One night in 1927, Rust remembered that cotton tended to stick to his wet hands (due to the dew); Rust took a nail and wetted it, and cotton stuck to the nail. It was at that point Rust was sure he could be successful.

Picture
      Rust needed to build a machine that could work on rough terrain, and the possibilities of things going wrong were endless. Rust's furst successful prototype was in 1933, and it picked more cotton in one hour than a person could in one week. But in 1933, no one wanted a machine that would create MORE unemployment during the Great Depression.
     By 1936 Rust completed his prototype, and the initial response among whites in the South was that the machine should be dumped in the nearest river. By 1940, Rust was desperate and broke, yet he still worked on his machine; Rust went all-in with one more effort to succeed. Rust didn't know that Allis-Chalmers, a large company, was trying to contact Rust, since they had decided that his old patents were feasible.
     Rust sold his patents to Allis-Chalmers, and the company hired Rust as a consultant. But when Allis-Chalmers finally manufactured a mechanical cotton picker in 1949, it made so few that the company lost its exclusive rights to Rust's designs. All the while, Harvester was going down the same road, and had started to manufacture mechanical cotton pickers by 1948. By then the machine was seen as the solution to the labor shortage created by the post-WW II surge of the Great Migration North.

Picture
     What also increased demand for the mechanical cotton picker was that the cost of labor increased; for the first time land owners in the South had to offer competitive wages to attract workers. The cost of labor tripled, from .62 per 100 lbs of picked cotton in 1940 to $1.93 in 1945, and to $2.90 by 1948. And to make matters worse for Southern cotton growers, they found themselves competing against synthetics like Rayon. And worse-yet for the Southern whites, in their perspective, African-Americans after World War II had become "uppity", especially young African-American men.
     Southern whites agreed that their future was with the coming mechanical cotton picker, and Harvester had built a factory in Memphis, which boded well. Harvester built 1000 machines in 1948, priced at $7600 ($76,000+ in 2015 dollars), and was mounted on a tractor . . . and it was tax deductible. 1948 was the year that convinced cotton growers to go mechanical; they had a good cotton crop, but they didn't have nearly enough workers to pick the crop. 
     Competition for building mechanical cotton pickers started in 1949, and cotton growers in California had the best experience using the machine. However, conditions in the Mississippi Delta were not as manageable compared to California. Pearson built 50 mechanical cotton pickers in 1949, and the company hired Rust to improve their machine so it would work properly in the Delta. Delta planters had a narrow window to pick their cotton, from the instant the crop was mature in late-September to around 20 October, when the rains always came, which amounted to about four weeks.
     Demand for the mechanical cotton picker among younger cotton growers was very high, and it was in this agricultural landscape that the competition for dominance among the farm implement companies. Pearson (with Rust), Harvester, and John Deere were all competing against each other to convince cotton growers that their mechanical cotton picker was supreme.

Picture
     By 1952, 10,000 mechanical cotton pickers were in use, and by 1955 the number was up to 20,000. By 1955, 25% of the total cotton crop was harvested by mechanical pickers, and by 1960, it was up to 55%. Also, it had taken 130 hours to pick a bale of cotton before, but with the mechanical cotton picker, it took 45 hours. From the beginning-to-the-end with cotton (seeds-to-harvest), mechanization meant that only 15 man-hours of work per acre were needed, compared to 155 man-hours of work per acre before the machine.
     Rust died in 1954, living long enough to see his invention roll off assembly lines. However, his mechanical cotton picker didn't help small cotton growers as he had envisioned. What occurred was that the mechanical cotton picker became a boon to corporate agriculture.

** Emmitt Till postscript: Sheriff Strider's nephew, Jesse, was elected sheriff in nearby Grenada county, and he was the antithesis of his uncle. Jesse helped rid the county of the KKK, and he hired African-American deputies. Jesse even appeared on TV to endorse an African-American candidate for Congress, which turned the election in favor of the candidate . . . slowly, very slowly, some social change was occurring in the American South in the 1950s.

0 Comments

    Archives

    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016

    Categories

    All
    18th Century
    19th Century
    20th Century
    Biography
    History

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.