Mr. Jensen's U.S. History Website
  • U.S. History Blog
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2025 - May 2026)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2024 - May 2025)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2023 - May 2024)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2022 - May 2023)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2021 - May 2022)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2020 - May 2021)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2019 - May 2020)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2018 - May 2019)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2017 - May 2018)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2016 - May 2017)
    • U.S. History Blog (May 2015 - May 2016)
    • U.S. History Blog (May, 2014 - May, 2015)
  • About

Elmer Ellsworth: The Union's First Civil War Hero

12/14/2014

0 Comments

 
       Source: Adam Goodheart: The Civil War Awakening (2011)
Picture
     At the dawn of the Civil War, Elmer Ellsworth was the Colonel of the First New York Fire Zouaves (Zouaves were fierce-fighting
Algerian tribesmen), made up of NYC Firefighters. As a boy, Ellsworth dreamed of military glory, and at the age of 18, he joined a Chicago militia group in the mid-1850s at a time when Americans were far more serious about their local militias. Ellsworth approached his militia much like a coach that was getting his team ready for a big game. Ellsworth proved to be a natural leader, and popular with his fellow militia members; at 19, he was elected to be the leader of the militia, with the rank of Major. 


Picture
     In Chicago, Ellsworth came across a French fencing expert/instructor that had fought with the French Zouaves in the Crimean War; the exploits of the French Zouaves had extensive coverage in American newspapers. In just a few years, Ellsworth became an expert drill instructor, fencer, and gymnast, and he used what he learned in training his militia, which he renamed the Zouaves. Unlike other militias in Chicago, Ellsworth had strict training, and strict rules (e.g. no drinking), and he earned even greater respect from his men as a result. 
     In both the North and South, by the late-1850s it was a short step from militancy to militarism; attitudes towards war had changed, and militant attitudes were in vogue. Local militias were an extension of the nationwide celebration of a voluntary military tradition while opposing a large professional army . . . the highest expression of Democratic values was to volunteer and sacrifice (even by death) for a region. 
     Ellsworth and the 60 Chicago Zouaves (with their unique eye-catching uniforms; pictured) toured America, demonstrating their military and gymnastic skills on a road trip that exceeded one-thousand miles. In New York City, they were welcomed with huge fanfare; it was official - America had caught "Zouave Fever". Ellsworth showed America that personal freedom could exist within military regimentation; it seemed to be truly Democratic soldiering. 
     Ellsworth was probably the first American to become famous solely due to charisma; during the Pre-Civil War Summer of 1860, it seemed all eyes were on Elmer Ellsworth. He became what today would be described as a sex symbol; photographs of Ellsworth were seemingly everywhere - he was the first pin-up figure in US History.

Picture
     In July, 1860, Ellsworth's Zouaves closed out their (Northern) national tour with a "performance" in Chicago. The Republican nominee for President, Abraham Lincoln, watched the performance anonymously, from a distance. Lincoln and Ellsworth had already become fairly close, with a relationship that was similar to an informal Father-Son situation; they were close enough that Ellsworth accompanied Lincoln to Washington, D.C. for his Inauguration. Ellsworth also became friends with one of Lincoln's aids, John Hay, who would become President Lincoln's personal secretary. 
     The surrender of Fort Sumter in April, 1861, must have felt like Manna from Heaven to Ellsworth; he was sure that his chance for glory would occur soon. The real question to Ellsworth was not when his chance for glory would occur, but WHERE it would happen. However, the landscape changed after Fort Sumter, and the Northern media actually turned on Ellsworth, portraying him and his Zouaves as "silly soldiers" that weren't ready for a real war.
     As events unfolded, even Ellsworth was in demand, in that there was a severe shortage of officers to lead the tens of thousands of incoming volunteers. Ellsworth, with a letter of introduction from President Lincoln, met with the most famous and influential newspaper man in America, Horace Greeley (pictured), asking for his help. Ellsworth wanted to raise a regiment of NYC Firefighters, men he believed were immediately ready for war. With Greeley's help, Ellsworth recruited over 1000 NYC Firefighters to his regiment, boasting to make all of them Zouaves. As Ellsworth's regiment marched into Washington, D.C., much was expected of him and his new group of Zouaves.

Picture
     On 23 May, 1861, Virginia's resolution to secede from the Union became official, and on the same day, federal (Union) troops crossed the Potomac River, which included the First New York Fire Zouaves, commanded by Colonel Elmer Ellsworth. Ellsworth was part of an advanced guard in Alexandria, Virginia (across the Potomac from Washington, D.C.), and in a spur-of-the-moment decision on 24 May, 1861, he decided to take down the huge rebel flag that was on the roof of the Marshall House, an Alexandria, VA hotel. That rebel flag had become famous in a notorious sort of fashion, in that the flag was so large, it could easily be seen from much of Washington, D.C. (President Lincoln would often view the flag from with White House with binoculars). Colonel Ellsworth and very small detachment of his Zouaves ascended to the roof of the hotel, and Ellsworth and one of his men were carrying the large flag down the hotel's stairs, when the hotel's owner (an ardent secessionist) killed Ellsworth with his shotgun as he was heading down between the 2nd and 3rd floors (the hotel owner was almost immediately killed by one of Ellsworth's Zouaves). Ellsworth's death released a torrent of emotion in the North, leading to a fivefold increase of volunteers. The death of Colonel Elmer Ellsworth released a tide of dammed-up enmity in the North; in other words, the murder of Ellsworth released the pent-up bloodlust that had been building for years in the Northern states. Ellsworth, in the weeks that followed, became a sort of "Union Saint"; Ellsworth's likeness was recreated in many forms, and were treated by many Northerners as de facto relics. Americans would not mourn another single death from the Civil War again until Easter Sunday, 1865.

     Postscript: At the 1st Battle of Bull Run (July, 1861), the 1st New York Fire Zouaves marched into battle, invoking the name of their fallen commander. Soldiers from the Army of Northern Virginia fired one volley into the Fire Zouaves, and the the regiment trained and briefly-led by Ellsworth retreated under fire. The Fire Zouaves had more men killed-in-action, wounded-in-action, or captured than any other Union regiment at 1st Bull Run.
                  Below: A WGN (Chicago) news segment on Elmer Ellsworth
0 Comments

"Wide-Awake": The Radicalization of the Election of 1860

12/6/2014

0 Comments

 
       Source: Adam Goodheart: The Civil War Awakening (2011)
Picture
     From the 1820s to 1860, there was a growing sense that America's leaders (and even citizens) had performed shamefully, especially when compared to the leaders of the Revolutionary War Era. By 1860, Americans were desperate for heroes, and a longing for the "Revolutionary War Spirit" was pervasive in the North and the South. A "Race of Giants" had given way to petty politicians, farmers, storekeepers, etc. The reality during the 1820s to 1860 was that politicians of those decades had to compromise in order to avoid sectional conflict. However, most citizens believed that their politicians were in the "Preservation" business, taking care of themselves, not the "Creation" business, like the leaders of the Revolutionary War Era, whose interests (Americans in 1860 believed) were for the public good. Despite the efforts of the "Preservationist" politicians, America was changing fast by 1860.

Picture
       In 1860, Americans everywhere were ravenous for news, hence the explosion of newspapers. Most Americans wanted to be the first to know the latest, and newspapers happily obliged. Aiding the supply of news to satisfy demand was the telegraph systems network which spanned 50,000 miles. Also, very fast "News Boats" sailed across the Atlantic in just 2 weeks, since there wasn't yet a Trans-Atlantic cable. What other people thought in other regions in America now mattered more than ever. 
     During the General Campaign of 1860, Stephen Douglas
(Northern Democrat, pictured) was the first presidential candidate to campaign by traveling great distances. Since it was rather unseemly to do so, his "Cover Story" was that he was traveling to visit his mother, and might as well campaign on the way. Republicans mocked his cover story, saying that he certainly seemed to have many relatives, since he kept traveling and campaigning; Lincoln stayed in Springfield, Illinois, not saying or doing much. By not saying/doing much, millions of Northerners started to see him as the embodiment of their hopes and ideals.
     The campaign imagery of Lincoln as a "Rail-Splitter" started in Illinois politics in order to provide a political identity, and a "hook" for name-recognition with voters. Using split rails for fences was incredibly common in the still mostly-rural U.S.; split rails represented hard work, success, and optimism for millions by 1860 . . . in the Election of 1860, Lincoln's rivals (Douglas, Breckenridge, Bell) were unable to equal the political symbolism of the Republicans.

Picture
     Democratic newspapers, in the North and South, turned the Election of 1860 into a referendum on slavery, and they did so in a very nasty manner, trying to scare whites with the prospect of "Equality For All". Democratic newspapers labeled the Republicans as the "Party of the N-------". Modern technology, especially the telegraph, made it possible for the shrillest ideologues to spread their vitriol (sound familiar today?). In the face of these attacks, Republican moderates (including Lincoln) talked about tariffs, jobs, markets, anything but slavery . . . but a grassroots army was banding together, wanting a "Holy War" against slavery.
     Most historians believe that grassroots movement started in February, 1860, when Cassius M. Clay, the most famous Southern Abolitionist from Kentucky (pictured), visited Hartford, Connecticut. Clay was escorted around Hartford parade-style, and the onlookers were very impressed, so much so that Republican "Marching Clubs" were formed . . . it was the birth of the Wide-Awakes. The Wide-Awakes in Hartford would march in the dead of night, with only their drums and boots on the ground making noise, and with many torches as well. This quickly became a political fad across the North as 1860 unfolded, many "enlisting" to be in a Wide-Awake group. In St. Louis, a local shopkeeper tutored local Wide-Awakes to the basics of military formations . . . the name of that shopkeeper . . . Ulysses S. Grant.

Picture
      The symbol of all Wide-Awakes was a sinister-looking (to some) single unblinking eye, which by design was to lead to various interpretations. The Wide-Awakes tapped into the tangible Revolutionary War Spirit in the North; it reached the point where the Republican Party had to not only acknowledge their existence, but to deal with them, and use them to gain votes. Southerners were watching the Wide-Awakes as well, with growing disquiet and alarm. 
     The Summer of 1860 was hot and dry, which led to ruinous fires in Southern states such as Texas. Originally, the fires were blamed on natural causes, but before long, the combination of continued fires and the growing influence of the Wide-Awakes led Southern newspapers to a false conclusion. Not long after Lincoln became the Republican nominee in Chicago, Southern newspapers started to claim that the fires were started by African slaves, and those slaves were inspired, and perhaps told/funded to do so by the Wide-Awakes. A rash of lynchings occurred, especially in Texas, trying to "get to the bottom" of the Abolitionist/Wide-Awake Conspiracy. Northern whites were even lynched with African slaves; in Texas, a Methodist minister was lynched due to his moderate attitudes towards slavery; his skin was taken from his corpse in order to be displayed as a public trophy.

Picture
     Many Northerners saw a "Southern Scheme" to expand slavery and create a "Slave Empire" in America. Many Southerners saw a "Northern Scheme" to fund/support radicals to arm African slaves, which was confirmed with John Brown at Harper's Ferry in 1859. However, most Americans were moderates, willing to tolerate the other region if it meant peace; the proof was that each presidential candidate in 1860 campaigned to attract moderate voters.
     But the Republican campaign became something that was neither intended or envisioned - they were about to be viewed as far more radical than moderate in the North and South. "Split Rails" epitomized the Republican Party's doctrine of free labor; quite often, Lincoln was portrayed in the campaign literature with a mallet (which was the tool actually used to split rails). The visual representations of Lincoln wedging rails to make fences showed power, but would Lincoln drive a wedge between the North and the South, leading to conflict? 
     In 1854, a mob of Abolitionists in Boston tried to free a captured slave by storming the building where he was held; a deputy was even killed in the process. The African slave was to be taken back South by his owner, so Federal troops escorted the "prisoner" away from the building, physically beating back those that tried to save him. It was the first time since the Revolutionary War Era that this level of civil disobedience existed in the city; to the tremendous glee of most of its citizens, Boston was once again a battleground for freedom. To Boston, and other like-minded citizens, Lincoln was viewed as just another "Chair-Warmer" in the White House for another four years; to them, Lincoln didn't go nearly far enough against the evils of slavery and Southern influence.

Picture
     To most Southerners, especially politicians, the conspiracy of the Wide-Awakes using African slaves to commit arson was taken as Gospel Truth. Southern states accelerated recruiting, training, and equipping their state militias in the Fall of 1860. Southerners had Revolutionary War Spirit as well; their local/state militias viewed themselves as "Minutemen" that needed to be on perpetual alert. In the Border States (Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland, & Delaware), Wide-Awakes were coming under attack, which led to the Wide-Awakes arming themselves so they could defend themselves in the increasing number of street battles . . . 
these street battles actually increased the number of Northern recruits to the Wide-Awakes.
     On 16 October, 1860, the largest and greatest parade of Wide-Awakes occurred in Boston; the number of participants in the parade exceeded ten thousand. Twenty-five years before, the Abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison was nearly lynched by a mob of Bostonians for his radical views; the parade passed in front of William Lloyd Garrison's home on purpose, with Garrison standing on his porch, "reviewing the troops". 
     The creation of, and the growing numbers and influence of the Wide-Awakes, meant that the Republicans had to use them to gain votes in the Election of 1860. Southerners, fueled by the belief that Wide-Awakes were behind a conspiracy using African slaves to commit waves of arson, came to view Abraham Lincoln as a threat to their existence, property, and prosperity. Lincoln never left Springfield while he campaigned for President, and he did his absolute-best to stay on a moderate course of action. However, events and people that Lincoln couldn't control led to Northerners viewing Lincoln as a champion against slavery, while Southerners saw Lincoln as a threat to their very existence.

0 Comments

    Archives

    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014

    Categories

    All
    19th Century
    20th Century
    Actor
    Biography
    History

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.